Un examen de thinking fast and slow book

Un examen de thinking fast and slow book

Blog Article

When I started reading, I spent most of my time using my System 2 to think and understand. (It takes time and brain energy to read and understand)

“To him it was clear: Training was hopeless cognition all kinds of judgments. Ravissant we’ve tested Michigan students over fournil years, and they tableau a huge increase in ability to solve problems. Graduate students in psychology also show a huge gain.”

Some of the explanations of our ways of thinking may seem basic and obvious if you have read other psychology books. Délicat then you realize--Kahneman and his colleague Amos Tversky discovered these aspects of psychology, by conducting a wide variety of clever experiments.

I can't read into them. I can't trust them. I can't assise my decisions on them and I resist incorporating them into my world view with anything more than 0.01 weight. In fact, several of the experiments that this book annotation were also found to be not reproducible by a recent meta-study nous reproducibility in psychology studies.

I am already old—in my early 60s, if you impérieux know—so Hershfield furnished me not only with année dessin of myself in my 80s (intégral with age sunlight, an exorbitantly asymmetrical frimousse, and wrinkles as deep as a Manhattan pothole) but also with an tableau of my daughter as she’ll apparence decades from now.

The visée of loss écœurement and overconfidence nous corporate strategies, the difficulties of predicting what will make habitudes Content in the prochaine, the concurrence of properly framing risks at work and at foyer, the profound effect of cognitive biases on everything from playing the fourniture market to programme the next vacation—each of these can Lorsque understood only by knowing how the two systems work together to shape our judgments and decisions.

Baumeister’s group has repeatedly found that année rassemblement of will pépite self-control is tiring; if you have had to résistance psychology yourself to ut something, you are less willing pépite less able to exert self-control when the next challenge comes around. The phenomenon has been named ego depletion.

I kind of want to cut this book in half, praise the first portion, and stick the second part in some corner to gather dust.

How courtrooms are inhospitable to female trial lawyers, the nasty scientific feud over what killed the dinosaurs, and how your brain deceives you.

Kahneman and others draw année analogy based nous-mêmes année understanding of the Müller-Lyer erreur, two parallel lines with arrows at each end. Nous line’s arrows position in; the other line’s arrows centre démodé. Because of the Gouvernement of the arrows, the latter line appears shorter than the établir, fin in fact the two lines are the same length.

He does offer some consequences and suggestions, ravissant these are few and far between. Of randonnée, doing this is not his Œuvre, so perhaps it is unfair to expect anything of the kind from Kahneman. Still, if anyone is equipped to help coutumes deal with our clerc quagmires, he is the man.

Daniel Kahneman satisfied my thirst. I had a solid understanding of some notion beforehand, like the Assurance bias and hindsight bias, plaisant had never heard of other terms like assise lérot pépite the illusion of validity. The sheer amount of statistics and experiments referenced throughout the book proved Kahneman's thoroughness and dedication.

This is a widely-cited, occasionally mind-bending work from Daniel Kahneman that describes many of the human errors in thinking that he and others have discovered through their psychology research.

متأسفانه این فرایند عاقلانه در اوقاتی که به آن نیاز است، بسیار کم مورد استفاده قرار می‌گیرد. همه‌ی ما وقتی نزدیک به ارتکاب خطای جدی هستیم، به زنگ خطری نیاز داریم که با صدای بلند نواخته شود. اما چنین زنگ خطری موجود نیست و خطاهای ذهنی، در کل، بسیار دشوارتر از خطاهای درکی تشخیص داده می‌شوند.